LCM_Dreamshaper_v7 vs Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 30 October 2026.
unsloth · B · Open weights
Params
6.2 B
Context
—
30d
963 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | LCM_Dreamshaper_v7 | Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 860 M | 6.2 B |
| Architecture | — | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | mit | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | 1 | 1 |
| Downloads 30d | 156,272 | 963,201 |
| Downloads all time | 4.2 M | 2.5 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | GGUF |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2023-10-14 | 2025-12-21 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 90 days (13 Aug – 10 Nov)
1.1 M49 K
LCM_Dreamshaper_v7
Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF · Q4_0
6.5 GB / 24 GB
LCM_Dreamshaper_v7 · fp16
10.4 GB / 24 GB