JiRackUltra_1b vs LFM2.5-2.6B-GGUF
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 27 October 2026.
CMSManhattan · A · Open weights
Params
1.8 B
Context
131,072
30d
891 K
mit · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | JiRackUltra_1b | LFM2.5-2.6B-GGUF |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 1.8 B | 2.6 B |
| Architecture | Qwen2ForCausalLM | — |
| Context length | 131,072 | 131,072 |
| Licence | mit | other |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Unknown |
| Languages | 13 | 16 |
| Downloads 30d | 891,277 | 186,819 |
| Downloads all time | 2.6 M | 2.5 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | GGUF, SAFETENSORS | GGUF, SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2026-08-02 | 2026-08-01 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 47 days (25 Sep – 10 Nov)
2.5 M187 K
JiRackUltra_1b
LFM2.5-2.6B-GGUF
A overtook B on 29 Sep
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
JiRackUltra_1b · Q4_K_M
2.0 GB / 24 GB
LFM2.5-2.6B-GGUF · Q4_0
2.6 GB / 24 GB
JiRackUltra_1b · fp16 @ 128K ctx
8.7 GB / 24 GB
LFM2.5-2.6B-GGUF · fp16 @ 128K ctx
18.6 GB / 24 GB