IP-Adapter-FaceID vs Juggernaut-XL-v9
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 21 September 2026.
RunDiffusion · B
Params
—
Context
—
30d
869 K
creativeml-openrail-m licence · conditional
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | IP-Adapter-FaceID | Juggernaut-XL-v9 |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | — | — |
| Architecture | — | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | — | creativeml-openrail-m |
| Commercial use | Unknown | Conditional |
| Languages | 1 | 1 |
| Downloads 30d | 185,226 | 869,216 |
| Downloads all time | 11.8 M | 7.6 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2023-12-20 | 2024-02-18 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 56 days (28 Jul – 21 Sep)
871 K162 K
IP-Adapter-FaceID
Juggernaut-XL-v9
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
IP-Adapter-FaceID · fp16
1.5 GB / 24 GB
Juggernaut-XL-v9 · fp16
15.9 GB / 24 GB