gpt-oss-120b vs MiMo-V2.5
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 6 August 2026.
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | gpt-oss-120b | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 120.4 B | 310.8 B |
| Architecture | GptOssForCausalLM | MiMoV2ForCausalLM |
| Context length | 131,072 | 1,048,576 |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | mit |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | — | 2 |
| Downloads 30d | 4,221,708 | 388,951 |
| Downloads all time | 48.6 M | 913 K |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2025-08-04 | 2026-04-27 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 10 days (28 Jul – 6 Aug)
4.3 M322 K
gpt-oss-120b
MiMo-V2.5
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
gpt-oss-120b · fp16 @ 128K ctx
433.0 GB / 24 GB
MiMo-V2.5 · fp16 @ 1024K ctx
6,314.7 GB / 24 GB