GLM-5.3-Flash-GGUF vs Laguna-M.1
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 23 October 2026.
poolside · B · Open weights
Params
225.8 B
Context
262,144
30d
568 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | GLM-5.3-Flash-GGUF | Laguna-M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 321.3 B | 225.8 B |
| Architecture | — | LagunaForCausalLM |
| Context length | — | 262,144 |
| Licence | mit | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | 2 | — |
| Downloads 30d | 891,797 | 568,241 |
| Downloads all time | 1.7 M | 585 K |
| Quantizations on the Hub | GGUF | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2026-08-26 | 2026-06-15 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 43 days (11 Sep – 23 Oct)
1.1 M199 K
GLM-5.3-Flash-GGUF
Laguna-M.1
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
Laguna-M.1 · fp16 @ 256K ctx
1,581.1 GB / 24 GB