GLM-4.7-Flash vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 6 August 2026.
farbodtavakkoli · B
Params
32.1 B
Context
262,144
30d
3.3 M
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | GLM-4.7-Flash | OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 31.2 B | 32.1 B |
| Architecture | Glm4MoeLiteForCausalLM | — |
| Context length | 202,752 | 262,144 |
| Licence | mit | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | 2 | 1 |
| Downloads 30d | 2,067,510 | 3,250,998 |
| Downloads all time | 10.6 M | 3.3 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2026-01-19 | 2026-07-23 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 10 days (28 Jul – 6 Aug)
3.3 M1.8 M
GLM-4.7-Flash
OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
GLM-4.7-Flash · fp16 @ 198K ctx
185.1 GB / 24 GB
OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT · fp16 @ 256K ctx
225.3 GB / 24 GB