Gemma-4-E4B-Uncensored-HauhauCS-Aggressive vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 24 October 2026.
HauhauCS · A · Open weights
Params
—
Context
—
30d
920 K
gemma licence · conditional
ISTA-DASLab · B · Open weights
Params
180.0 B
Context
—
30d
6.5 M
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | Gemma-4-E4B-Uncensored-HauhauCS-Aggressive | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | — | 180.0 B |
| Architecture | — | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | gemma | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Conditional | Allowed |
| Languages | 2 | — |
| Downloads 30d | 920,213 | 6,513,173 |
| Downloads all time | 8.1 M | 6.7 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | GGUF | GGUF |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2026-04-02 | 2026-09-07 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 83 days (3 Aug – 24 Oct)
6.5 M887 K
Gemma-4-E4B-Uncensored-HauhauCS-Aggressive
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
Gemma-4-E4B-Uncensored-HauhauCS-Aggressive · Q4_K_M
6.4 GB / 24 GB
Adjacent comparisons
GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
Qwen3.8-27B-iMatrix-NVFP4-MTP-GGUF vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-HauhauCS-Aggressive-MTP-GGUF vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-abliterated-GGUF
gemma-4-31B-it vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF