gemma-3-270m vs tiny-mixtral
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 6 August 2026.
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | gemma-3-270m | tiny-mixtral |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 270 M | 250 M |
| Architecture | Gemma3ForCausalLM | MixtralForCausalLM |
| Context length | — | 131,072 |
| Licence | gemma | — |
| Commercial use | Conditional | Unknown |
| Languages | — | — |
| Downloads 30d | 2,148,430 | 489,554 |
| Downloads all time | 15.7 M | 2.7 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | Yes — accept licence | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2025-08-05 | 2024-04-24 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 10 days (28 Jul – 6 Aug)
2.1 M470 K
gemma-3-270m
tiny-mixtral
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
gemma-3-270m · fp16
1.1 GB / 24 GB
tiny-mixtral · fp16 @ 128K ctx
2.2 GB / 24 GB