fairface_age_image_detection vs rorshark-vit-base
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 21 September 2026.
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | fairface_age_image_detection | rorshark-vit-base |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 90 M | 90 M |
| Architecture | ViTForImageClassification | ViTForImageClassification |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | — | — |
| Downloads 30d | 1,081,365 | 777,289 |
| Downloads all time | 795.7 M | 21.3 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2024-12-06 | 2023-11-18 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 56 days (28 Jul – 21 Sep)
4.5 M775 K
fairface_age_image_detection
rorshark-vit-base
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
rorshark-vit-base · fp16
0.9 GB / 24 GB
fairface_age_image_detection · fp16
2.4 GB / 24 GB
Adjacent comparisons
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs fairface_age_image_detection
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs rorshark-vit-base
vit-base-patch16-224 vs fairface_age_image_detection
vit-base-patch16-224 vs rorshark-vit-base
nsfw_image_detection vs fairface_age_image_detection
nsfw_image_detection vs rorshark-vit-base