efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k vs vit_small_patch16_224.augreg_in21k_ft_in1k
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 21 September 2026.
timm · B
Params
20 M
Context
—
30d
430 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k | vit_small_patch16_224.augreg_in21k_ft_in1k |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 10 M | 20 M |
| Architecture | — | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | — | — |
| Downloads 30d | 12,697,960 | 430,068 |
| Downloads all time | 36.8 M | 9.6 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2022-12-12 | 2022-12-22 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 43 days (10 Aug – 21 Sep)
12.7 M233 K
efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k
vit_small_patch16_224.augreg_in21k_ft_in1k
A overtook B on 26 Aug
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k · fp16
0.6 GB / 24 GB
vit_small_patch16_224.augreg_in21k_ft_in1k · fp16
0.6 GB / 24 GB
Adjacent comparisons
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k
resnet18.a1_in1k vs efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k
tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k vs efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k
vit-base-patch16-224 vs efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k
efficientnet_b0.ra_in1k vs efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs vit_small_patch16_224.augreg_in21k_ft_in1k