efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k vs vit_base_patch16_384.augreg_in21k_ft_in1k
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 10 September 2026.
timm · A · Open weights
Params
10 M
Context
—
30d
242 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
timm · B · Open weights
Params
90 M
Context
—
30d
192 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k | vit_base_patch16_384.augreg_in21k_ft_in1k |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 10 M | 90 M |
| Architecture | — | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | — | — |
| Downloads 30d | 242,068 | 192,041 |
| Downloads all time | 36.9 M | 2.0 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2022-12-12 | 2022-12-22 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 90 days (13 Aug – 10 Nov)
12.7 M192 K
efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k
vit_base_patch16_384.augreg_in21k_ft_in1k
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k · fp16
0.6 GB / 24 GB
vit_base_patch16_384.augreg_in21k_ft_in1k · fp16
0.9 GB / 24 GB
Adjacent comparisons
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs vit_base_patch16_384.augreg_in21k_ft_in1k
efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k vs vit_tiny_patch16_224.augreg_in21k
efficientnet_b2.ra_in1k vs efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k
vit-base-patch16-224 vs vit_base_patch16_384.augreg_in21k_ft_in1k
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k
efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k vs convnextv2_tiny.fcmae_ft_in22k_in1k