dreamshaper-7 vs Z-Image-Turbo-FP8
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 6 August 2026.
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | dreamshaper-7 | Z-Image-Turbo-FP8 |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 860 M | — |
| Architecture | — | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | creativeml-openrail-m | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Conditional | Allowed |
| Languages | 1 | 1 |
| Downloads 30d | 894,984 | 59,446 |
| Downloads all time | 4.2 M | 887 K |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2023-08-26 | 2025-11-26 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 10 days (28 Jul – 6 Aug)
903 K59 K
dreamshaper-7
Z-Image-Turbo-FP8
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
dreamshaper-7 · fp16
9.7 GB / 24 GB
Z-Image-Turbo-FP8 · fp16
14.0 GB / 24 GB