dreamshaper-7 vs Qwen-Image-GGUF
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 31 August 2026.
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | dreamshaper-7 | Qwen-Image-GGUF |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 860 M | — |
| Architecture | — | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | creativeml-openrail-m | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Conditional | Allowed |
| Languages | 1 | 2 |
| Downloads 30d | 899,724 | 17,540 |
| Downloads all time | 5.6 M | 111 K |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | GGUF, SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2023-08-26 | 2025-08-05 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 56 days (28 Jul – 21 Sep)
905 K17 K
dreamshaper-7
Qwen-Image-GGUF
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
Qwen-Image-GGUF · fp16
0.8 GB / 24 GB
dreamshaper-7 · fp16
9.7 GB / 24 GB
Qwen-Image-GGUF · Q4_0
13.5 GB / 24 GB