dreamshaper-7 vs Qwen-Image-Edit-Rapid-AIO-GGUF
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 6 August 2026.
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | dreamshaper-7 | Qwen-Image-Edit-Rapid-AIO-GGUF |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 860 M | — |
| Architecture | — | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | creativeml-openrail-m | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Conditional | Allowed |
| Languages | 1 | — |
| Downloads 30d | 894,984 | 35,599 |
| Downloads all time | 4.2 M | 413 K |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | GGUF |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2023-08-26 | 2025-10-16 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 10 days (28 Jul – 6 Aug)
903 K35 K
dreamshaper-7
Qwen-Image-Edit-Rapid-AIO-GGUF
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
dreamshaper-7 · fp16
9.7 GB / 24 GB
Qwen-Image-Edit-Rapid-AIO-GGUF · Q4_K_M
15.2 GB / 24 GB