DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF vs Ornith-1.5-397B-NVFP4
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 10 November 2026.
ISTA-DASLab · A · Open weights
Params
763.2 B
Context
—
30d
3.3 M
mit · commercial OK
ornith-ai · B · Open weights
Params
397.0 B
Context
—
30d
478 K
mit · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF | Ornith-1.5-397B-NVFP4 |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 763.2 B | 397.0 B |
| Architecture | — | Qwen3_5MoeForConditionalGeneration |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | mit | mit |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | — | — |
| Downloads 30d | 3,270,121 | 478,250 |
| Downloads all time | 3.3 M | 1.3 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | GGUF | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2026-10-23 | 2026-08-18 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 16 days (26 Oct – 10 Nov)
3.3 M187 K
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
Ornith-1.5-397B-NVFP4
A overtook B on 27 Oct
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
Ornith-1.5-397B-NVFP4 · fp16
411.4 GB / 24 GB
Adjacent comparisons
DeepSeek-V3.2 vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
GLM-5.3 vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
DeepSeek-R1 vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
GLM-5 vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
DeepSeek-V3 vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF