DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF vs Ornith-1.5-397B-FP8
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 10 November 2026.
ISTA-DASLab · A · Open weights
Params
763.2 B
Context
—
30d
3.3 M
mit · commercial OK
ornith-ai · B · Open weights
Params
403.4 B
Context
—
30d
365 K
mit · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF | Ornith-1.5-397B-FP8 |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 763.2 B | 403.4 B |
| Architecture | — | Qwen3_5MoeForConditionalGeneration |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | mit | mit |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | — | — |
| Downloads 30d | 3,270,121 | 364,985 |
| Downloads all time | 3.3 M | 979 K |
| Quantizations on the Hub | GGUF | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2026-10-23 | 2026-08-18 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 16 days (26 Oct – 10 Nov)
3.3 M193 K
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
Ornith-1.5-397B-FP8
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
Ornith-1.5-397B-FP8 · fp16
521.2 GB / 24 GB
Adjacent comparisons
DeepSeek-V3.2 vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
GLM-5.3 vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
DeepSeek-R1 vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
GLM-5 vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
DeepSeek-V3 vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF