DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF vs Llama-3.1-405B-FP8
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 10 November 2026.
ISTA-DASLab · A · Open weights
Params
763.2 B
Context
—
30d
3.3 M
mit · commercial OK
meta-llama · B · Open weights
Params
405.9 B
Context
—
30d
465 K
llama3.1 licence · conditional
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF | Llama-3.1-405B-FP8 |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 763.2 B | 405.9 B |
| Architecture | — | LlamaForCausalLM |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | mit | llama3.1 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Conditional |
| Languages | — | 8 |
| Downloads 30d | 3,270,121 | 465,185 |
| Downloads all time | 3.3 M | 2.7 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | GGUF | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | Yes — accept licence |
| First seen on the Hub | 2026-10-23 | 2024-07-20 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 16 days (26 Oct – 10 Nov)
3.3 M412 K
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
Llama-3.1-405B-FP8
A overtook B on 27 Oct
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
Llama-3.1-405B-FP8 · fp16
597.3 GB / 24 GB
Adjacent comparisons
DeepSeek-V3.2 vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
GLM-5.3 vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
DeepSeek-R1 vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
GLM-5 vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
DeepSeek-V3 vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF