DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF vs GLM-5.3-CYBERSECURITY-FP8
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 9 November 2026.
ISTA-DASLab · A · Open weights
Params
763.2 B
Context
—
30d
3.3 M
mit · commercial OK
dealignai · B · Open weights
Params
753.3 B
Context
1,048,576
30d
130 K
mit · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF | GLM-5.3-CYBERSECURITY-FP8 |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 763.2 B | 753.3 B |
| Architecture | — | GlmMoeDsaForCausalLM |
| Context length | — | 1,048,576 |
| Licence | mit | mit |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | — | 10 |
| Downloads 30d | 3,270,121 | 130,443 |
| Downloads all time | 3.3 M | 254 K |
| Quantizations on the Hub | GGUF | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2026-10-23 | 2026-08-30 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 16 days (26 Oct – 10 Nov)
3.3 M130 K
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
GLM-5.3-CYBERSECURITY-FP8
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
GLM-5.3-CYBERSECURITY-FP8 · fp16 @ 1024K ctx
15,295.6 GB / 24 GB
Adjacent comparisons
DeepSeek-V3.2 vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
GLM-5.3 vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
DeepSeek-R1 vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
GLM-5 vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
DeepSeek-V3 vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF