BiRefNet vs mask2former-swin-tiny-coco-instance

Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 31 July 2026.

ZhengPeng7 · A · Open weights
Params
220 M
Context
—
30d
1.0 M
mit · commercial OK
facebook · B · Open weights
Params
50 M
Context
—
30d
211 K

Specification comparison

Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.

Specification BiRefNet mask2former-swin-tiny-coco-instance
Parameters 220 M 50 M
Architecture BiRefNet Mask2FormerForUniversalSegmentation
Context length — —
Licence mit other
Commercial use Allowed Unknown
Languages — —
Downloads 30d 1,014,054 211,330
Downloads all time 21.2 M 4.4 M
Quantizations on the Hub SAFETENSORS SAFETENSORS
Gated No No
First seen on the Hub 2024-07-12 2022-12-23

Download trend

Daily snapshots, last 90 days (13 Aug – 10 Nov)

1.0 M211 K
BiRefNet mask2former-swin-tiny-coco-instance

VRAM side by side

On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted

mask2former-swin-tiny-coco-instance · fp16 0.7 GB / 24 GB
✅ Runs comfortably
BiRefNet · fp16 1.0 GB / 24 GB
✅ Runs comfortably

Adjacent comparisons